[ the main topic page ] [ the main page ]

Dr Timi Ecimovic - professor and chair of Environmental Sciences at Ansted University

Self-destruction of Humankind due to Lack of Knowledge

Timi Ecimovic

The Nature – interpretation of the form and content of the Nature by mankind has got new turn. First the understanding of human sciences was questionable due to subjectivity of interpretation. Since commencement of the mankind it was newer content of the nature under research but form. So it is even today, and we think it is time to look and research deeply the content of the Nature.
Mankind took approximately 200.000 years to meet globalization ages and generally talking we may say: “Our technological improvements are so successful that some of them are as a potential threat to self-destruction of the mankind and destruction of life on the planet Earth”.
Let us commence with globalization, culture cum civilization affairs at 2011. In our opinion and research we have exposed at mentioned literature, we think the technological improvements of the mankind is not beneficial for long time existence of mankind on the planet Earth.
Present human population is facing lack of food, drinking and sanitary water, living space, and habitation. It is worst since commencement of mankind. With urban centres we are experiencing life of humans within fragile environmental qualities, which does not support living.
The reason for technological advancement of mankind could be connected with early research of algebra and geometry of ancient Greeks and scientist of great cultures of antiquity – China, Egypt, India, and Persia. Somehow with evolvements of history, mathematics have got role of scientific language. As side effect the mathematics become ruler of the development done by humans. It was the mankind way of thinking, writing and measurements needed for technological improvement and constructions. All natural sciences have been influenced by mathematics and consequently major research has been done on form and contents have been neglected. Antiquity was time of settlement and improvements of the social issues. In some time it was time when the mankind have chosen the on the ground constructions as basic form of constructing houses or monumental buildings. We are discussing the time of around last 10.000 years B. C.
As result the urban centres become protected against destructions, which could be done by humans. It was in reality commencement of the human local environments, urban centres, ports, military barracks, roads, aqueducts, temples and light houses. Major protecting walls have been invented, and improvement of the armaments and military techniques become most important issue of humanity. It was time of tribal movements to new territories, first written documents and commencement of the philosophy and scientific research works. The social improvements resulted with great kingdoms of the ancient world. It was time of ancient Roman’s and as Roman, Tit Makcij Plavt invented saying “Homo homini lupus” or “Men to men wolf”. It took mankind 3.000 years to invent nuclear destructing devices, and finally globalization.
So by 2011 we may report the following high dangerous technologies, which could end mankind present civilization. Let us commence with nuclear technologies.

1.   Nuclear technologies are mankind inventions as technologies for mass killing of humans. Of course they are present in the Nature, as a part of the matter/energy transformation, construction of the stars, and many other phenomenon of the Nature. Mankind research on the atoms and particles resulted with high tech mass killing armaments, nuclear power stations, and many other innovations of nuclear research practical use. Ecimovic at many occasions statement connected with nuclear technologies is/was: “Nuclear research should remain locked within research laboratories”. The threat of nuclear technologies whatsoever use by mankind is number one threat for planetary life on the planet Earth.

We are recommending moratorium for use of nuclear technologies by humans. Secondly the research and any experiments with nuclear, particles, matter/energy transformation should not be carried within the planet Earth requisitely holistic system + (Earth body, atmosphere, Moon and 3 million kilometres from the planet Earth surface).
Present human experiences did not open reasonable possibilities for safe use of nuclear technologies. In status quo of the biosphere humans could have safe use, but the biosphere and planet Earth system is never at status quo, but always is moving according to its evolvement. Recent earthquake in Japan has opened reality of our use of nuclear technologies. It should never happen again. Our global mankind community, globalization, culture cum civilization could not be happy with leadership during last 200 – 300 years due to catastrophic possibilities, which could end present biosphere, mankind and other living creatures on the planet Earth.
Our proposal for management of the nuclear technologies is opening possibilities for sustainable future of global mankind community.

2.   Second most dangerous nature phenomenon the climate change system, due to mankind interference with nature, and because of mankind lack of knowledge about the nature operation systems has been triggered and the climate change system is on the move. Predicting of the quality of the biosphere environment in future is not possible, and global mankind community have to undergo long way of sustainable future social technique improvement which may in future assist survival of global mankind community.

The climate change system needs future research co-ordinated from one centre. The option of survival is closely connected with ability of present global mankind community to understand the Nature, the climate change system and many more systems of the nature.
We are proposing rethinking of present knowledge on the nature itself and the nature phenomenon knowledge, and establishment of the centre for global studies of the Nature. It is prerequisite for success.

3.   The global mankind community population explosion is not properly researched and understood, and as result we have population explosion. It is not question whether the planet Earth has enough resources or not. The population explosion is the nature phenomenon, which is ending bad impact of the certain evolution process. System thinking, holistic approach, and knowledge should assist global mankind community to work out proper complex problem solving technique. Definitely it is connected with sustainable future of mankind, and actually it is corner stone issue for future of mankind on the planet Earth. Mankind should understand issues of population explosion, consequences, and on the basis of reality and knowledge should agree on the path for survival – sustainable future of mankind.

Our proposal is to undertake path of sustainable future of mankind – «From sustainability of local community to sustainable future of global mankind community».

4.   The global mankind community synthetic chemical research and production has been extraordinary successful. Today we estimate that at present synthetic chemical research and production recognize synthetic chemical substances and compounds in millions. The problem with synthetic chemical research and production is not in techniques or production technologies, but is in global mankind community relationship with this field of activity. There is non negative attitude towards synthetic chemical research and production and many well known scientist and The Nobel Price recipients are among synthetic chemical researchers. But let us make closer look to this global mankind community activity. Science beyond the synthetic chemical research and production has no connections with knowledge of the Nature. All chemical activity in the Nature has got reason, but in many cases humans do not understand it.

The synthetic chemical knowledge of humanity has basis at relatively easy knowledge and experimental work. With development of chemistry it was possible to develop synthetic chemical compounds using different techniques. As result many known chemist invented countless number of synthetic chemical products. The use of them, production and commercial success was only important. Almost all of synthetic chemical products of modern humanity have no research on short, medium and long term impact and consequences of them to the nature.
Pesticides would never be in use if mankind knew of their medium and long term destructive and pollution abilities of the natural environment.
In theory or academic discussion we think, it is possible for chemist to invent synthetic chemical product, which could commence chain reaction in the air, and as result the oxygen from the air could get status as was during primordial times – zero. It happen with CFC’s and commencement of the ozone protection band destruction, If humans did not learn of chlorine atom destruction ability to break ozone molecule, today would be not many living creatures within the biosphere of the planet Earth. The biocide rays, if not stopped by ozone protection layer would end present life forms including humans
We are recommending moratorium on use of synthetic chemicals without proper knowledge of them and interference with the Nature.

5.   The leadership of global mankind community – at present we have chaos of national and international leaders, of whom there is non able to handle global issues successfully. Even worse, present mankind has leadership of money master monster system including national, international and all other forms of money, banking, insurance and other financial activities. Real value of the money is many fold artificially increased, and people handling money issues are not able to put it into real present.

Money as system should have deep rethinking to be again useful assistant to mankind and not a ruler, master, monster, and whatsoever as it is today.
We are recommending leadership of global mankind community as direct democracy, world federation constitution, world parliament and world government, which will with morality and wisdom govern global mankind community affairs.
Self-destruction of global mankind community under leadership of master monster money system is just a matter of time.

6.   The technology management – number of technologies in use are very dangerous for possible self-destruction. To mention some: GMO and GMP are technologies based upon form of genetic code and generally are issue of experiment: Particles research should be carried out at minimum of 3 million kilometres far from the planet Earth; Wars and armaments development including human mass destruction means either physical, chemical or biological has no place at planet Earth; On ground constructions and mega concentration of humans at one location (mega cities) are most fragile environments for humans to live at, and should be rethought as form of shelter for humans; Use of natural environment for transition to the human artificial environment – towns, roads, railways, airports, ports, military complexes, education centres, hospitals, sport centres and etc are taking more and more natural environment space, which practice should be revised; transport technologies, space and universe research and development should clean and reduce waste deposition within the planet Earth space, and etc.

Any technology management should have clear vision of possibilities for destruction in short, medium and long term use.
The list of possible self-destructions of humans by humans could not be concluded, because the activities are innumerable and many new innovations are coming without the knowledge of their short, medium and long term use implications with the natural environment of the planet Earth.

Conclusions

Our intention with this presentation is not to correct present mankind practices and life styles but to commence long term process of by morality and wisdom guided global mankind community sustainable future, what we hope is our contribution towards life of our and all mankind descendants.

DECLARATION
Of
The World Thinkers’ Panel on the Sustainable Future of Humankind

People throughout the world are against the culture of violence and war. They are for a culture of friendship, solidarity, tolerance and peace. (By a decision of 52/13, the decade 2001 to 2010 was unanimously proclaimed “International Decade for a Culture of Peace and non-violence to all children of the world” by the General Assembly of the United Nations.)

On 15th August 2011 the World Thinkers’ Forum, Ansted University, Sir Prof. Dr. Major Roger Haw Boon Hong, Penang, Malaysia, SEM Institute for Climate Change, Prof. Dr. Timi Ecimovic, Zg. Medosi, Korte, Slovenia, Prof. Dr. Dana Marie Barry (USA) and Organisation for Protection of Children Rights, Hon. Ricaardoe Di Done, Montreal, Canada, Ambassador Dato’ Dr. Ang Ban Siong (China), Dr. Nixon Yap (Malaysia), Professor Tang Shui Yuan, Chairman of the “1st International Conference on Protect the Earth and Ocean” in Xiamen, China, and Dr. Garfield Brown, South Africa, proposed founding the panel as follows:

Within the World Thinkers’ Forum is an open and new working panel named: “The World Thinkers’ Panel on the Sustainable Future of Humankind.” For short it is represented by the following acronym “WTP-SFM” and has the sign displayed above.

The addresse for it is at Korte 124, SI 6310 Izola – Isola, Slovenia.

A long list of people of good will, academicians, scientists, politicians, workers, administration and governemnt officials, and many others are supporting this Declaration. Among them are members of the SEM Institute for Climate Change, the Ansted University family, and honorable and other members of the World Thinkers’ Forum, etc.

The theorethic and practical background for this Declaration can be found in many works about “Sustainable Development” and “Sustainable Future of Humankind.” The trilogy, “Sustainable Future of Humankind,” Ecimovic, and many more scientists’ work during the first decade of the 21st century could serve as theoretical background. It can be seen at the following link - www.institut-climatechange.si  

Members and supporters of the Declaration are free of charge members. The UN, national governemts, international corporations, international institutiona, national institutions, education institutions and others, are invited to co-operate on the work for the sustainable future of humankind.

The Declaration is giving rights, and is asking for individual social responsibility from members of the human global community: (7000000000+ individuals). The goal is to reach global sustainability of the global humankind community. The global sustainability is a transition from sustainable development societal technique to the sustainable future societal technique. The UN and agencies, especialy the UNEP and UNESCO, are welcome to co-operate for the common goal of sustaining the future of humankind.

Our individual lives are very short, and their value and meaning are found substantially in fact that we are integral parts of the “human project”. We must support the continuum of humankind because what we are fundamentally is human beings who are inseparable from the continuum, a continuum that includes our descendents and future generations. As human beings we are responsible for each other and for future generations.

 “The World Thinkers’ Panel on the Sustainable Future of Humankind” provides a platform for people (interested in the arts, scientific & cultural activities and peace mission projects) to meet and to work together. The primary goal of the said platform is to create a level of understanding and tolerance between the various peoples of the world and to contribute to the promotion and maintenance of world peace. We welcome all individuals and groups of the world irrespective of race, sex, language and religion. The work of “The World Thinkers’ Panel on the Sustainable Future of Humankind” is based on the respect of human rights and basic liberties of all peoples of the world. This relates directly to the active participation of UNESCO’s project “Culture of Peace”

The task of “The World Thinkers’ Panel on the Sustainable Future of Humankind” is a forum for all non-governmental institutions, ministries, public offices, scientific and cultural organizations as well as institutes, diverse organizations, museums, universities, foundations, unions, associations, business organizations and other establishments. It is also for individuals who are practically, organizationally and scientifically engaged in promoting cultural activities, folk art, culture heritage and scientific activities.   

Besides the working order and the activities of our world-wide organization for the practical, organizational, and above all scientific work for culture, we also have to meet a very important, social, humanistic, and cultural-political order. Many of us have learned and grown from being a new member of “The World Thinkers’ Panel on the Sustainable Future of humankind”.

The Declaration is giving rights, and is asking for individual social responsibility of members of the human global community: 7 billion individuals. The goal is to reach global sustainability of the human global community. The global sustainability is a transition from sustainable development societal technique to the sustainable future societal technique.

The UN and agencies, especialy the UNEP and UNESCO, are welcome to co-operate for the common goal of sustaining the future of humankind. This declaration will go on to other parts of the world.

We think all members of global humankind community have the responsibility to help when needed. Many grant foundations of Culture, Arts, and Scientific institutions (from local and international levels) will give support to the development of common interests.

We believe that “The World Thinkers’ Panel on the Sustainable Future of Humankind” not only contributes to the attainment and exercise of these rights, but that multiculturalism plays a role in solving some of the problems in modern society.

The founding group of “The World Thinkers’ Panel on the Sustainable Future of Humankind” has established the following categories for making “The World Thinker’s Panel on the Sustainable Future of Humankind.” These categories (that are listed and described below) are important for the panel to achieve its recognition at the international level.

Categories

1.  Characteristics of traditional culture

2.  Virtues of traditional culture in a modern society

3.  Traditional culture and cultural diversity

4.  Traditional culture and rights to culture

5.  Traditional culture and multiculturalism

6. Plans for the promotion of traditional culture through systematic continuing study of traditional culture, systematization of exchange of traditional culture and regional cooperation, regular conduct of a traditional culture-related forum and development of cultural industry based on traditional culture.

1. Characteristics of traditional culture

A traditional culture is a way and system of life that is practiced by a people for generations, and features an eco-friendly culture where humans coexist with nature, where an individual is relatively less alienated from the others, and when the spiritual culture is pursued more than the material ones.

2. Virtues of traditional culture in a modern society

Since the advent of modernization and industrialization, our modern society has faced a number of obstacles and problems such as the breakdown of ecosystems due to the indiscriminate conquests of nature, severe natural disasters, cut throat competition in the world markets, unbalanced distribution of wealth, widespread human alienation, attachment to material values at the expense of spiritual values, making it so difficult to lead a humane life. In this context, the traditional culture is of great use for solving such problems in a modern society. In particular, the Confucian cultures in East Asia think highly of ‘filial piety’ and ‘respect’ that are core values, and which are of great worth and merit to remove distrust and enmity between generations and help recover the dignity in human beings.

3. Traditional culture and cultural diversity

The traditional culture is the result of communication and interactions between human beings who have individually adapted themselves to geographical and ecological environments, best representing the individual identity and uniqueness of nations and regions. It can be therefore said that the traditional culture underlies the diversity of world and regional cultures.

4. Traditional culture and rights to culture

The constituents of a nation are entitled to have a political and social life, as well as a culture life. They should have the rights to exercise the freedom to accept the past as well as the present culture. In current times, traditional culture as identified with the past does not belong to the mainstream, therefore, making it difficult for people to appreciate it. In order to satisfy their cultural needs, cultural policies should be set and practiced so that they may have access to traditional culture anywhere and anytime.

5. Traditional culture and multiculturalism

Our contacts and interactions with cultures can make us have a better understanding of other cultures. Therefore, we get to have a better understanding of the different regions and its peoples, further aiding in attaining made and preferentially based on traditional culture. More emphasis on traditional culture and arts is especially needed so that it retains the indigenous ethos of a region.

6. Plans for the promotion of traditional culture

The traditional culture has a meaningful importance as shown above, and for its conservation and promotion, some plans are proposed below. It is so recommended that governments, private groups and community make active co-operating efforts in realizing this.

(I) Systematization of exchange of traditional culture and regional cooperation.

The exchange of traditional culture has value in promoting multiculturalism. Until today, the exchanges have been made unsystematically and at random, not probably enabling people to gain easy access to other traditional cultures. In order for a community to exercise their equally cultural rights and enjoy any other traditional cultures, more exchanges and regional co-operation should be ensured institutionally. Governments, private groups and communities should give attention to this.

(II) Regular conduct of a traditional culture-related forum.

The forum should be held regularly for enhancing understanding of traditional cultures in areas, for contribution to the peace of mankind and the world at large, and for maintaining diversity of cultures worldwide, thus accepting multiculturalism, and allowing the nation and community to awake to the importance of traditional culture.

(III) Development of a cultural industry based on traditional culture.

For a traditional culture to be sustainable and alive in modern living, its advantaged competitiveness should be ensured and closely adhered to the life of a community. It is also required that the cultural industry such as folk art and craft art should be developed with traditional cultural assets. The cultural industry affects modern living, and so the traditional culture, uniquely separate from other modern cultural assets, should be made to contribute to satisfying the cultural demands of community.

This Declaration is more fundamental than a mere professional production. It reflects the present endangered status of our global community of humankind, and the absolute need for a better tomorrow characterized by global environmental sustainability and knowledge. The Declaration should be the beginning of the road toward a truly sustainable future of humankind, and harmony of humankind living within the biosphere realities of the planet Earth. This should be our contribution toward the lives of our descendants. The UN and national governments have to transcend from the present, and co-operate for needed changes to sustain the future of humankind. We need a planetary perspective, planetary leadership, and planetary values.

Our present time period should be enriched with active work towards a sustainable future. Also we need skillfull, global, humankind community leadership, under preconditions of individual and collective social responsibility. We must support the accurate scientific knowledge of Nature and humanistic sciences, as well as support and promote respect, peace, morality, and wisdom.

I wish to see the global promotion of ideas from this Declaration and a sustainable future of humankind.

 

Prof. Dr. Timi Ecimovic

[ the main topic page ] [ the main page ]